{"id":11645,"date":"2025-03-04T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T22:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?p=11645"},"modified":"2025-03-03T10:02:37","modified_gmt":"2025-03-03T00:02:37","slug":"barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/tag\/susan-harris-rimmer\/\">SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER<\/a> AND <a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/tag\/elise-stephenson\/\">ELISE STEPHENSON<\/a>&nbsp; |&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding traditions, diplomacy plays a pivotal role in fostering stability, economic growth, and regional collaboration. However, as global attention increasingly turns to diversity in representation, a critical question arises: How inclusive is the pathway to becoming a diplomat in this region?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Security vetting processes, as explored in <em>&#8220;Bolstering the Boys&#8217; Club: Security Vetting, Diversity and Diplomatic Gatekeeping&#8221;<\/em>, are key to understanding this question. While these procedures aim to safeguard national security, they also act as cultural gatekeepers, shaping the diplomatic landscape. In the Asia-Pacific, where the interplay of traditional values and modern aspirations is complex, these processes may perpetuate gendered and racialised barriers, stymying inclusive growth in diplomacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Gendered barriers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Across the region, gender disparities in diplomatic representation mirror global trends. Despite progress in some nations, systemic biases linger:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Australia<\/strong>: Women now make up 59 per cent of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), with gender parity in senior roles achieved in 2023. Yet, intersectional representation remains limited, with only one Indigenous woman ambassador in Australia&#8217;s history and few queer diplomats of colour.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Southeast Asia<\/strong>: While countries like Indonesia and the Philippines have seen women in high-ranking foreign service roles, cultural and institutional barriers continue to limit broader gender equity in postings and leadership.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pacific islands<\/strong>: Traditional social structures and limited resources often restrict diverse representation in diplomatic careers, even as Pacific nations advocate for global action on climate and equity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In all cases, security vetting reinforces these disparities by embedding subjective assessments of loyalty, trustworthiness, and &#8220;fit.&#8221; These criteria often align with patriarchal and ethnocentric norms, disadvantaging women and minorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vetting and cultural norms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The article highlights how security vetting processes fail to adapt to changing societal values, a concern particularly relevant in the Asia-Pacific:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cultural perceptions of gender<\/strong>: In many Asia-Pacific nations, societal expectations about women&#8217;s roles influence assessments of their &#8220;maturity&#8221; or &#8220;trustworthiness&#8221; in professional settings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Intersectional barriers<\/strong>: Indigenous, LGBTQIA+, and other marginalised groups face compounded biases. For example, queer individuals may be deemed unsuitable for diplomatic roles due to perceptions of non-conformity to traditional values, as seen in both conservative and progressive states in the region.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Under-screened threats<\/strong>: Misogynistic beliefs, domestic violence histories, and discriminatory attitudes often escape scrutiny in vetting. Such oversight undermines workplace safety and perpetuates institutional bias, eroding trust in diplomatic institutions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Reforming Asia-Pacific diplomacy: A path forward<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To align the region\u2019s diplomacy with its aspirations for inclusivity and progress, security vetting must evolve. The article\u2019s recommendations resonate strongly in the Asia-Pacific context:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Greater transparency<\/strong>: Nations like Japan, South Korea, and Australia, which are revisiting diversity in foreign service, can lead by demystifying their vetting processes and ensuring accountability.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Inclusivity metrics<\/strong>: Incorporating metrics that evaluate the impact of security vetting on diversity, particularly in multilateral forums like ASEAN or APEC, can foster regional collaboration on inclusivity.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Rethinking threat assessment<\/strong>: Screening for extremist gendered attitudes or discriminatory behaviours must be prioritised to ensure a diplomatic corps that upholds regional values of respect and equality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Building research frameworks<\/strong>: Collaborative research across Asia-Pacific academic institutions can address the transparency challenges of vetting, offering new methodologies for evaluating its impacts on diversity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>As the Asia-Pacific navigates its role in an evolving global order, its diplomatic institutions must embody the region&#8217;s rich diversity. Security vetting, though rooted in safeguarding nations, must not become a tool of exclusion. By addressing biases and reforming these processes, the region can create a diplomatic pipeline that reflects its modern aspirations and collective values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The road to inclusive diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific requires bold reforms and collaborative efforts, ensuring that those who represent the region on the world stage reflect its multifaceted identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"author label\"><strong>AUTHORS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Professor Susan Harris Rimmer<\/strong>&nbsp;is the Director of the Griffith University Policy Innovation Hub and a member of the Griffith Asia Institute.<strong> Dr Elise Stephenson <\/strong>is Deputy Director of the Global Institute for Women\u2019s Leadership, the Australian National University and Adjunct Fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This article is a synopsis of a journal article titled \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/journals\/hjd\/19\/3\/article-p536_4.xml\">Bolstering the Boys Club: Security Vetting, Diversity and Diplomatic Gatekeeping\u201d<\/a>, published in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, written by Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding traditions, diplomacy plays a pivotal role in fostering stability, economic growth, and regional collaboration. However, as global attention increasingly turns to diversity in representation, a critical question arises: How inclusive is the pathway to becoming a<a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"sr-only\">&#8220;Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":11646,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2064,2142,245,246,247,1021,1727],"tags":[501,654,2395,320,1350,799,2396,1419],"class_list":["post-11645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-governance-and-diplomacy","category-journal-article","category-china-and-north-east-asia","category-india-and-south-asia","category-indonesia-and-southeast-asia","category-pacific-outlook","category-sdg5","tag-asia-pacific","tag-diplomacy","tag-diversity","tag-elise-stephenson","tag-gender-equality","tag-security","tag-security-vetting","tag-susan-harris-rimmer"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Jill Moriarty","yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/03\/Diplomacy.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\"},\"headline\":\"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\"},\"wordCount\":721,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Asia-Pacific\",\"Diplomacy\",\"Diversity\",\"Elise Stephenson\",\"Gender Equality\",\"Security\",\"Security vetting\",\"Susan Harris Rimmer\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Governance and diplomacy\",\"Journal article\",\"Region | China and Northeast Asia\",\"Region | India and South Asia\",\"Region | Indonesia and Southeast Asia\",\"Region | Papua New Guinea and the Pacific\",\"SDG 5 Gender equality\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\",\"name\":\"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Insights\",\"description\":\"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"width\":2930,\"height\":308,\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GAIGriffith\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/author\/gaigriffith-edu-au\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights","description":"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights","og_description":"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.","og_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/","og_site_name":"Griffith Asia Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/03\/Diplomacy.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Griffith Asia Institute","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_site":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Griffith Asia Institute","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/"},"author":{"name":"Griffith Asia Institute","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a"},"headline":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy","datePublished":"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/"},"wordCount":721,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"keywords":["Asia-Pacific","Diplomacy","Diversity","Elise Stephenson","Gender Equality","Security","Security vetting","Susan Harris Rimmer"],"articleSection":["Governance and diplomacy","Journal article","Region | China and Northeast Asia","Region | India and South Asia","Region | Indonesia and Southeast Asia","Region | Papua New Guinea and the Pacific","SDG 5 Gender equality"],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/","name":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy | Griffith Asia Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-03-03T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-03T00:02:37+00:00","description":"SUSAN HARRIS RIMMER AND ELISE STEPHENSON&nbsp; |&nbsp; In the Asia-Pacific, where rapid social and political changes intersect with longstanding Security vetting, a key step in selecting diplomats, plays a critical yet often unseen role in shaping who gets to represent nations on the global stage. While designed to protect national interests, these processes can also reinforce gendered, racialised, and cultural biases, limiting diverse representation in diplomacy. Susan Harris Rimmer and Elise Stephenson explore how security vetting functions as a gatekeeping tool, often disadvantaging women, Indigenous communities, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and other marginalised groups.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/barriers-at-the-gate-security-vetting-and-its-impact-on-regional-diplomacy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Barriers at the gate: Security vetting and its impact on regional diplomacy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","name":"Griffith Asia Insights","description":"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","width":2930,"height":308,"caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/GAIGriffith"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/author\/gaigriffith-edu-au\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/03\/Diplomacy.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/03\/Diplomacy.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}