{"id":11720,"date":"2025-04-14T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-13T22:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?p=11720"},"modified":"2025-04-12T09:41:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-11T23:41:27","slug":"can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/tag\/nirogini-thambaiya\/\">NIROGINI THAMBAIYA<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/tag\/kanchana-kariyawasam\/\">KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM<\/a> AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it&#8217;s reshaping how we live, work, and create. From composing music and generating images to writing articles, AI\u2019s creative capabilities are challenging long-held assumptions about authorship and originality. But in Australia, copyright law is still playing catch-up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, what happens when a machine creates something? Can an AI be an author? Should AI-generated works be protected by copyright? And if so, who owns that copyright?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The rise of creative machines<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Since the launch of tools like ChatGPT, DALL\u00b7E 2, and Midjourney, we\u2019ve seen an explosion of AI-generated content\u2014text, images, video, music, and even software. These tools don\u2019t just assist humans\u2014they can act autonomously, producing outputs with little or no human input.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This rise of generative AI raises a key question: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote\"><blockquote><p>Can something created by a machine qualify for copyright protection?<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Australia\u2019s Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) was drafted with human creators in mind. It recognises an &#8220;author&#8221; as the person who creates the work\u2014and that \u201cperson\u201d has always meant a human being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Understanding AI-created content: assisted vs generated<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two main categories of AI-related creative output:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>AI-assisted works: The human plays a central role\u2014guiding the process, editing outputs, making key decisions. These works are usually protected as they reflect human intellectual effort.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>AI-generated works: These are created by the AI with little or no human involvement beyond \u00a0\u00a0AI programing. The human contribution is minimal.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>While this distinction seems clear, it&#8217;s often hard to draw the line. AI still depends on humans\u2014training models, crafting prompts, and curating outputs. So, is a work truly AI-generated if a human shaped the conditions for its creation?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Copyright and originality: the human element<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>TTo be protected under Australian copyright law, a work must:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Fall into one of the categories of subject matters (artistic, literary, dramatic or musical works) and subject-matters other than works (films, sound recordings, broadcast and published editions).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Be original (not copied),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Be recorded in material form (e.g., written, drawn, or saved), and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Have a human author.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Australian copyright law states &nbsp;only a human can create a protected work. If AI produces a song or story without human intellectual input, it likely doesn\u2019t qualify as \u201coriginal\u201d under the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Current interpretations suggest &nbsp;AI-generated works are not protected under the Copyright Act\u2014meaning they may fall into the public domain instantly. Anyone could use them freely, without permission or payment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who owns AI-generated works?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;If AI-generated content meets the requirements of &nbsp;copyright protection, who would own the rights?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The AI itself? Not possible under current law, as AI is neither natural nor \u00a0a legal person.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The AI programmer? Their role , is tied to the final output, and involves case-by-case analysis to decide.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The AI user? Possibly, if their input shows significant intellectual effort\u2014but often it doesn\u2019t.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The AI owner? Ownership may be attributed to the person or entity that invested in AI. .<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>None of these options align with &nbsp;&nbsp;the current Australian Copyright law. That\u2019s why change is needed..<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The case for legal reform<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s a growing consensus that Australia\u2019s copyright framework needs modernising.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One model comes from the <em>UK Copyight, Design and Patent Act 1988 (CDPA)<\/em>, where computer-generated works are treated as a distinct category, and copyright is granted to the person who made the necessary arrangements for their creation. This more flexible approach sidesteps the strict human authorship requirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Australia could follow suit by introducing a separate category for AI-generated content, with its own rules on ownership, rights, and duration. Without reform, two major risks loom:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Loss of protection: Valuable AI-generated content could be unprotected and unmonetised.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Legal uncertainty: Creators, platforms, and users won\u2019t know their rights or responsibilities\u2014leading to disputes and stalled innovation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A human touch is still required<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In Australia, only works with meaningful human input are protected. Without that spark of human creativity, AI creations remain outside the bounds of copyright law.&nbsp; &nbsp;This ensures that copyright is granted &nbsp;not only &nbsp;for the final product but also for the creative effort behind the work.Recommended actions: Preparing for an AI-creative future<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As AI continues to evolve, everyone involved in the creative economy\u2014from artists and academics to startups and policymakers\u2014needs to stay informed and proactive. Here are two key actions to consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1. Advocate for legal reform<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Support calls for copyright law reform to address the challenges posed by AI-generated works. Engage with government consultations, industry bodies, or academic networks pushing for clearer legal guidance in this emerging space.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2. Monitor global developments<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Keep an eye on how other jurisdictions\u2014such as the UK, EU, and U.S.\u2014are handling AI and copyright. These global precedents may influence future Australian reforms and offer alternative models to consider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"author label\"><strong>AUTHORS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em><em>Nirogini Thambaiya and Kanchana Kariyawasam are members of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.griffith.edu.au\/research\/business\/asia-institute\">Griffith Asia Institute<\/a>, Griffith University, and Chamila Talagala is a member of the Asia Pacific School of Business and Law, Charles Darwin University.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>This article is a synopsis of the journal article, Thambaiya, N., Kariyawasam, K., &amp; Talagala, C. (2025). Copyright law in the age of AI: analysing the AI-generated works and copyright challenges in Australia.&nbsp;International Review of Law, Computers &amp; Technology, 1\u201326. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13600869.2025.2486893\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13600869.2025.2486893<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it&#8217;s reshaping how we live, work, and create. From composing music and generating images to writing articles, AI\u2019s creative capabilities are challenging long-held assumptions about authorship and originality. But in Australia, copyright law is still playing catch-up.<a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"sr-only\">&#8220;Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":11721,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2066,2142,1053],"tags":[1361,745,2424,2425,1048,2423],"class_list":["post-11720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-and-innovation","category-journal-article","category-australia","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-chamila-talagala","tag-copyright-law","tag-kanchana-kariyawasam","tag-nirogini-thambaiya"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Jill Moriarty","yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it&#039;s reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it&#039;s reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/AI-copyright.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\"},\"headline\":\"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"AI\",\"Artificial intelligence\",\"Chamila Talagala\",\"Copyright law\",\"Kanchana Kariyawasam\",\"Nirogini Thambaiya\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Business and innovation\",\"Journal article\",\"Region | Australia\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\",\"name\":\"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it's reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Insights\",\"description\":\"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"width\":2930,\"height\":308,\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GAIGriffith\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/author\/gaigriffith-edu-au\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights","description":"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it's reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights","og_description":"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it's reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.","og_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/","og_site_name":"Griffith Asia Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/AI-copyright.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Griffith Asia Institute","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_site":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Griffith Asia Institute","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/"},"author":{"name":"Griffith Asia Institute","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a"},"headline":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI","datePublished":"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/"},"wordCount":904,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"keywords":["AI","Artificial intelligence","Chamila Talagala","Copyright law","Kanchana Kariyawasam","Nirogini Thambaiya"],"articleSection":["Business and innovation","Journal article","Region | Australia"],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/","name":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI | Griffith Asia Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-13T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-11T23:41:27+00:00","description":"NIROGINI THAMBAIYA, KANCHANA KARIYAWASAM AND CHAMILA TALAGALA&nbsp; |&nbsp; Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a buzzword \u2013 it's reshaping how As generative AI transforms how we create content\u2014from art and music to code and written works\u2014Australia\u2019s copyright laws are struggling to keep up. Can an AI be an author? Who owns AI-generated content? And what legal reforms are needed to ensure fairness and clarity? In this blog, Nirogini Thambaiya, Kanchana Kariyawasam and Chamila Talagala unpack the key legal challenges, explore international comparisons, and offer practical actions for creatives, policymakers, and tech users.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/can-a-robot-be-an-author-navigating-the-legal-maze-of-copyright-in-the-age-of-ai\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can a robot be an author? Navigating the legal maze of copyright in the age of AI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","name":"Griffith Asia Insights","description":"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","width":2930,"height":308,"caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/GAIGriffith"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/author\/gaigriffith-edu-au\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/AI-copyright.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/AI-copyright.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11720\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}