{"id":9488,"date":"2022-11-14T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-13T22:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?p=9488"},"modified":"2024-03-18T18:55:29","modified_gmt":"2024-03-18T08:55:29","slug":"privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/","title":{"rendered":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/tag\/ron-bevacqua\">RON BEVACQUA<\/a>\u00a0 |\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-3-the-anti-democratic-aims-of-right-leaning-neo-liberalism\/\">third post in this blog series<\/a> discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights above all other rights. This means that property holders are a protected class, overriding the political and civil rights of everyone else. It is highly anti-democratic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights over all others appears even more bizarre when one considers how strange our ideas about property rights are in general.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Modern property law is derived from Roman law. Roman law says that the basic form of property is private property, and that private property means that owners have the absolute power to do anything they want with their possessions\u2013\u2013have, use, enjoy their produce, and abuse or alienate them. But what does it really mean for a person to have a legally-recognised relationship with a thing? How can a thing have legal standing in such an arrangement?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is, of course, a convenient fiction. We do not have relationships (legal or otherwise) with things. In reality, property law formalises an arrangement between the owner and <em>other people<\/em> concerning things.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, there is one important exception. There is a \u201cthing\u201d that an owner can have a relationship with, and it is perhaps the most valuable thing of all: a slave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Indeed, according to Harvard sociologist and slavery expert <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.es\/books?id=9SQBBAAAQBAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\">Orlando Peterson<\/a>, the notion of absolute property rights in Rome was derived from slavery. Early Romans, like the Greeks before them, <a href=\"https:\/\/lawlegal.eu\/actio-in-rem\/\">defined<\/a> property as a claim between the owner and \u201call the world\u201d, and this was useful when property was mostly tangible things. As slavery expanded, the old definition did not work because there was no legal way to define \u201call the world\u201d in a way that did not include the slaves themselves (who no doubt would have objected to being considered someone\u2019s property).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So instead of a relationship between people, Romans invented the concept of a relationship between a person and a thing. The model they used was the Roman household (<em>domus<\/em>), where the <em>paterfamilias<\/em> had absolute authority over the <em>familia<\/em>, which originally referred not to blood relations but to all the people in the <em>domus<\/em>, including slaves. In fact, Latin <em>familia<\/em> is derived from <em>famulus<\/em>, one of the Latin words for house slaves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The word they chose for private property rights, <em>dominium<\/em>, was derived from <em>dominus<\/em>, originally meaning \u201cmaster\u201d before it was generalised to mean \u201cowner\u201d. <em>Dominium<\/em> was more than just a relationship between a person and a thing, it meant the owner had absolute power over it. Thus, Roman property law took a principal of domestic authority, with the <em>paterfamilias<\/em> having absolute authority over the people in his household, including slaves, and extended that logic to objects. In this way, it is easier to conceptualise a relationship between a person and an object if the starting point is the relation between two people, one of whom is an object.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Since the concept of property was so closely intertwined with slavery, the Roman concept of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/en\/openeconomy\/two-notions-of-liberty-revisited-or-how-to-disentangle-liberty-and-slavery\/\">freedom<\/a> was based on the power of an individual to dispose of his property as he sees fit\u2013\u2013something someone who was unfree (a slave) could not do. Under this view, there is no real difference between private property, freedom, and political power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When one realises that private property is an expression of power, neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession over protecting property rights comes into focus. No one expressed these views more clearly than the American James McGill Buchanan, who formed and led the Center for the Study of Public Choice&nbsp;at George Mason University outside Washington DC with funding from corporate donors including Charles Koch, himself a member of the Mont P\u00e8lerin Society since 1970.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Buchanan\u2019s work on \u201cpublic choice\u201d theory (the use of economic tools in political science) won him a Nobel Prize for Economics in 1986, right at the end of his term as president of the Mont P\u00e8lerin Society (1984-86).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The starting point for the analysis that won Buchanan the Nobel was that political actors are not concerned with the common good or the public interest, but in fact are self-interested and seek&nbsp; their own advantage. Elected politicians will make multiple costly promises to multiple constituencies that they cannot keep, and bureaucrats will continually seek to expand their power and resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Especially in a democracy, a state like this will eventually redistribute wealth to maintain legitimacy. In Buchanan\u2019s view, therefore, the people who needed protection the most in a democracy were property owners. In his book Property as a Guarantor of Liberty (1993), he <a href=\"https:\/\/econpapers.repec.org\/bookchap\/elgeebook\/382.htm\">wrote<\/a> that their rights could only be secured though constitutional limits in democracies to prevent politics (i.e., voters) from encroaching on them. Indeed, he had already put that idea into practice in 1981 when he <a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/a\/kap\/revaec\/v32y2019i1d10.1007_s11138-017-0410-3.html\">advised<\/a> the Pinochet government in Chile to amend the constitution to require balanced budgets and supermajorities in parliament for any changes of substance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, since even constitutional limits can be changed in a democracy, as early as his 1975 book The Limits of Liberty, he <a href=\"https:\/\/oll.libertyfund.org\/title\/kliemt-the-collected-works-of-james-m-buchanan-vol-7-the-limits-of-liberty?html=true#Buchanan_0102-07_560\">acknowledged<\/a> the logical conclusion of his recommendations: \u201cDespotism may be the only organisational alternative to the political structure that we observe.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This may sound extreme until one remembers that Buchanan was a Tennessean whose career began around the time of the US civil rights movement. Whereas slaveholders in English and French colonies were <a href=\"https:\/\/newrepublic.com\/article\/166102\/reckoning-slavery-ended-kris-manjapra-black-ghost-empire\">compensated<\/a> when slavery was abolished, the US\u2019s Southern planter oligarchs viewed themselves as ultimate victims of the state\u2019s ability to confiscate property. Jim Crow laws kept former slaves and their descendants landless and dependent on their former masters long into the twentieth century, and desegregation was another political interference in their property rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The founding members of the Mont P\u00e8lerin Society did not have slavery in mind when they wrote their manifesto, but the logic is the same. Intangible \u201cproperty\u201d is inherently worthless unless there are people to farm the land, work the mines, and run the machines. Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s goal is not only that property owners keep all of their profits, but that they have no constraints on how they manage their properties, including the people who work on them. Given their strong opposition to even basic elements of a healthy democracy such as public education and public health, it isn\u2019t difficult to imagine what kind of labour force right-leaning neo-liberals prefer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"author label wp-block-paragraph\">AUTHOR<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Ron Bevacqua<\/strong>&nbsp;is an Adjunct Research Fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute as well as the Co-Founder and Managing Director of ACCESS Advisory Inc.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights above all other rights. This means that property holders are a protected class, overriding the political and civil rights of everyone else. It is highly anti-democratic. Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights over [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":9489,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1170,1764,1973,1729,1728,1055],"tags":[1734,1715,1714,1735],"class_list":["post-9488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-privatising-poverty","category-sdg-1-no-poverty","category-sdg10","category-sdg8","category-economies-and-development","tag-neo-liberalism","tag-privatising-poverty","tag-ron-bevacqua","tag-slavery"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Jill Moriarty","yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Griffith Asia Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@GAIGriffith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Griffith Asia Institute\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\"},\"headline\":\"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1098,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/slavery-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Neo-liberalism\",\"Privatising poverty\",\"Ron Bevacqua\",\"Slavery\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Commentary\",\"Privatising poverty\",\"SDG 1 No poverty\",\"SDG 10 Reduced inequalities\",\"SDG 8 Decent work and economic growth\",\"Topic-Economies and development\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/\",\"name\":\"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/slavery-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/slavery-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/slavery-1.jpg\",\"width\":900,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"Slave irons (Wikimedia Commons)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Insights\",\"description\":\"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1\",\"width\":2930,\"height\":308,\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/griffithasiainstitute\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/GAIGriffith\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a\",\"name\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Griffith Asia Institute\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\\\/asiainsights\\\/author\\\/gaigriffith-edu-au\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights","description":"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights","og_description":"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights","og_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/","og_site_name":"Griffith Asia Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","article_published_time":"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Griffith Asia Institute","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_site":"@GAIGriffith","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Griffith Asia Institute","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/"},"author":{"name":"Griffith Asia Institute","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a"},"headline":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery","datePublished":"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/"},"wordCount":1098,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","keywords":["Neo-liberalism","Privatising poverty","Ron Bevacqua","Slavery"],"articleSection":["Commentary","Privatising poverty","SDG 1 No poverty","SDG 10 Reduced inequalities","SDG 8 Decent work and economic growth","Topic-Economies and development"],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/","name":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery | Griffith Asia Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-11-13T22:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-18T08:55:29+00:00","description":"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 The third post in this blog series discussed how right-leaning neo-liberalism, as opposed to classical liberalism, places property rights","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","width":900,"height":500,"caption":"Slave irons (Wikimedia Commons)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-4-right-leaning-neo-liberalisms-obsession-with-property-rights-runs-through-slavery\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 4: Right-leaning neo-liberalism\u2019s obsession with property rights runs through slavery"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","name":"Griffith Asia Insights","description":"Asia Insights is published by the Griffith Asia Institute. It offers latest commentary on Asia-Pacific affairs and aims to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#organization","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/GU_Griffith-Asia-Institute_rgb_red_horizontal.png?fit=2930%2C308&ssl=1","width":2930,"height":308,"caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/griffithasiainstitute\/","https:\/\/x.com\/GAIGriffith"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/#\/schema\/person\/8121b8aa336749474cbaca380c03029a","name":"Griffith Asia Institute","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f133de65681da3b20ddbc1917f066f458d355d7dfa1f214b10ff4bd135d5ab6c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Griffith Asia Institute"},"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/author\/gaigriffith-edu-au\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10227,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/privatising-poverty-series-part-9-financial-inclusion-the-money-pump-of-market-based-development-and-poverty-reduction\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":0},"title":"Privatising Poverty Series Part 10: \u00a0Financial inclusion\u2013\u2013the money pump of market-based development and poverty reduction","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"2 November 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"RON BEVACQUA\u00a0 |\u00a0 This blog series has traced the history of the idea that promoting entrepreneurship and innovation is the key to unlocking economic growth and reducing poverty. As we have seen, it is distinctly American in its conceptualisation: forged in an economic context of the first advanced economy to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Commentary&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Commentary","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/commentary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Financial inclusion\u2013\u2013the money pump of market-based development and poverty reduction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/privatising-poverty-10.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/privatising-poverty-10.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/privatising-poverty-10.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/privatising-poverty-10.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7648,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/poverty-and-power-womens-entrepreneurship-in-the-asia-pacific-region\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":1},"title":"Poverty and power:  Women\u2019s entrepreneurship in the Asia-Pacific region","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"22 July 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The Asia-Pacific region is changing the world. It hums with an entrepreneurial energy and spirit of opportunity that permeates everywhere from local marketplaces to the sprawling headquarters of multinational corporations.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Asia Pacific Women&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Asia Pacific Women","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/feature-series\/asia-pacific-women\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Asia Pacific Region","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/07\/Elise-Stephenson-900-x-500.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/07\/Elise-Stephenson-900-x-500.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/07\/Elise-Stephenson-900-x-500.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/07\/Elise-Stephenson-900-x-500.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7441,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/trade-and-poverty-some-considerations-for-pacific-island-countries\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":2},"title":"Trade and poverty: Some considerations for Pacific island countries","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"11 June 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"DEVENDRA NARAIN, KELERA ROGOIRUWAI AND TARLOK SINGH In September 2015, the United Nations general assembly adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) to be achieved by 2030. Goal number one is to eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere and to reduce the share of people of all ages living in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Commentary&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Commentary","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/commentary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/06\/fiji-trade-900x500-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/06\/fiji-trade-900x500-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/06\/fiji-trade-900x500-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/06\/fiji-trade-900x500-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":530,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/microfinance-rights-and-global-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":3},"title":"Microfinance, rights and global justice","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"21 August 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"LUIS CABRERA\u00a0 | Edited by\u00a0Tom Sorell, University of Warwick and\u00a0Luis Cabrera, Griffith University, Queensland PUBLISHED BY: Cambridge University Press DATE PUBLISHED: August 2015 FORMAT: Hardback ISBN: 9781107110977 Microfinance - the practice of providing small loans to promote entrepreneurial activity among those with few financial assets - is increasingly seen as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Publications&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Publications","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/08\/luis-book.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/08\/luis-book.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/08\/luis-book.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/08\/luis-book.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":10044,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/maritime-safety-for-lives-and-livelihoods-the-multiplier-effect-of-a-well-connected-pacific\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":4},"title":"Maritime safety for lives and livelihoods: The multiplier effect of a well-connected Pacific","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"13 October 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"HEATHER WRATHALL | This article provides a comprehensive overview of the maritime safety needs of the Pacific region and its impact on various aspects of development, such as economic productivity, access to essential services, and achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. It effectively highlights the challenges faced by maritime services and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Pillar 2: Livelihoods and culture&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Pillar 2: Livelihoods and culture","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/feature-series\/pacific-outlook-feature-series\/livelihoods-culture\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Passengers departing inter-island ferry between the major Islands of Fiji, Viti Levu and Vanua Levu highlight the maritime safety needs of the Pacific.","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/pacific-maritime-transport.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/pacific-maritime-transport.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/pacific-maritime-transport.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/10\/pacific-maritime-transport.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9918,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/strategic-denial-and-australias-pacific-mindset\/","url_meta":{"origin":9488,"position":5},"title":"Strategic denial and Australia\u2019s Pacific mindset","author":"Griffith Asia Institute","date":"21 August 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This is the first in a three-part series in which GAI Industry fellow Ian Kemish AM explores the history of Australia\u2019s public mindset towards the Pacific.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Pillar 3: Geopolitics and diplomacy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Pillar 3: Geopolitics and diplomacy","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/category\/publication\/feature-series\/pacific-outlook-feature-series\/geopolitics-diplomacy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Australia's Pacific mindset - map of Oceania overlayed with people silhouette.","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/08\/pacific-mindset-part-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/08\/pacific-mindset-part-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/08\/pacific-mindset-part-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/08\/pacific-mindset-part-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/11\/slavery-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9488\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9489"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/asiainsights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}