{"id":1362,"date":"2018-10-16T09:24:29","date_gmt":"2018-10-15T23:24:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/?p=1362"},"modified":"2022-07-15T13:29:08","modified_gmt":"2022-07-15T03:29:08","slug":"how-the-australian-government-is-failing-on-countering-violent-extremism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2018\/10\/16\/how-the-australian-government-is-failing-on-countering-violent-extremism\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Australian government is failing on countering violent extremism"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Keiran Hardy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was first published on<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Countering violent extremism (CVE) programs are recognised globally<\/a> as a critical part of successful counter-terrorism strategies. In addition to anti-terrorism laws and surveillance powers, governments need CVE programs to address the underlying causes of terrorism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism strategy remains focused on prosecuting individuals for offences like being a member of a terrorist organisation<\/a> or conspiring to plan a terrorist act<\/a>. Prosecution is a necessary response to terrorism, but it remains a short-term solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When it comes to investing in longer-term, community-based approaches to preventing terrorism, my research has found that the federal government is failing. An analysis of federal budget documents suggests that dedicated funding for CVE programs has dried up and grant money is no longer being allocated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And at the state level, the majority of funding is still being funnelled into policing and prisons, rather than longer-term community solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are CVE programs?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCountering violent extremism\u201d is a broad term that refers to strategies for addressing terrorist ideology and radicalisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These programs are generally designed to prevent homegrown terrorism and include youth mentoring projects<\/a>, interfaith sporting activities<\/a>, police-led intervention programs<\/a> and efforts to \u201cderadicalise\u201d hardened terrorist prisoners<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CVE programs have proliferated around the world in recent years. My current research compares Australia\u2019s approach with those in Denmark<\/a>, Germany<\/a>, Sweden<\/a> and other countries in Western Europe. In the Muslim world, countries from Saudi Arabia<\/a> to Malaysia <\/a>have also developed similar strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recognising the importance of community programs<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Formally, the federal government recognises community-based approaches to CVE as a crucial component of its counter-terrorism strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The National Counter-Terrorism Plan<\/a> establishes that the federal government will:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

provide oversight and coordination of nationally significant CVE projects to prevent, divert or rehabilitate individuals from violent extremism.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This includes \u201cpractical efforts\u201d at the Commonwealth level to \u201cbuild the resilience of communities to violent extremism\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dedicated CVE funding was first included under the attorney-general\u2019s portfolio in the 2010 federal budget. At the time, the Rudd government allocated A$9.7 million to support a \u201cBuilding Community Resilience\u201d<\/a> grants program over the following four years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Liberals initially dropped Labor\u2019s CVE funding after taking power in 2013, but later reinstated it in the mid-year outlook. This followed backlash over the failure of the Abbott government to engage<\/a> appropriately with Muslim communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2017\/18 federal budget allocated A$9.3 million<\/a> to CVE programs for that financial year, with that amount dropping to A$6.1 million over the forward estimates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Funding quietly disappears<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Since the creation of the new Home Affairs Department<\/a> last year, it appears the federal government has again backtracked and decided to no longer fund these community-based programs to CVE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Community-based CVE programs are not a silver bullet, nor are they a replacement for law enforcement and intelligence gathering. But even a small amount of money for CVE programs in the next federal budget would signal a commitment to this strategy and allow for new pilot initiatives to be developed<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The 2018\/19 federal budget allocated A$158 million<\/a> for what used to be the attorney-general\u2019s National Security and Criminal Justice<\/a> program. However, the line item dedicated to CVE, which previously funded grants to community and grassroots organisations, was removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is possible that some of this A$158 million is still being allocated to community-based initiatives, but there is no indication this is the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CVE section on the Home Affairs Department\u2019s website links only to Living Safe Together<\/a>, a community-based grants program introduced by Abbott\u2019s government. The program, however, no longer appears to be active. The grants were all awarded in 2015<\/a> and the longest was for an 18-month project. The latest news<\/a> on the website dates from November 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a Senate Estimates hearing<\/a> last year, a representative from the attorney-general\u2019s CVE centre confirmed that the A$1.9 million in grants awarded through the program were designed as one-off payments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Department for Social Services, meanwhile, has allocated A$36.6 million to a community resilience fund<\/a>, but these projects are not designed to address the risks of terrorism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, what does this mean in terms of Australia\u2019s commitment to community-based counter-terrorism programs? With dedicated funding now apparently gone, it remains unclear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

State governments trying to fill the void<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Fortunately, the states are taking on a more significant role in CVE. However, their investment in community-based approaches remains small compared to funding for counter-terrorism policing and prison de-radicalisation initiatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recently, the NSW government announced A$47 million<\/a> to increase the capacity of the Goulburn Supermax prison and A$89 million<\/a> to fund a program to monitor high-risk terrorism-related offenders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, just A$12 million in funding was devoted to community-based programs<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Victoria has established a community resilience unit<\/a> within the Department of Premier and Cabinet and allocated A$14.1 million over two years to CVE programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet, the state is allocating A$20.9 million<\/a> to implement a rash of harsh new anti-terror laws, including allowing police to detain terror suspects for up to four days without a warrant. It\u2019s also investing A$25 million to provide Victorian police with long-range firearms<\/a> to better respond to terrorist attacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Queensland\u2019s latest budget included A$53.8 million over four years to enhance counter-terrorism policing<\/a>, with no dedicated CVE funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The state is investing A$46.7 million to build a new counter-terrorism and community safety centre<\/a>, which will include firearms ranges and a \u201clife-like scenario village\u201d for police to practise responding to terrorist incidents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What should the federal government do?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The federal government needs to clarify whether it supports community-based approaches to CVE, and if so, whether it will continue to fund them. One-off payments to grassroots organisations are not adequate to address the underlying causes of terrorism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Community-based CVE programs are not a silver bullet, nor are they a replacement for law enforcement and intelligence gathering. But even a small amount of money for CVE programs in the next federal budget would signal a commitment to this strategy and allow for new pilot initiatives to be developed. These programs could then be evaluated by researchers to build an evidence-based understanding of their impact and effectiveness, which is currently lacking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Australia has led the world in creating some of the most rights-infringing legal responses to terrorism. These include ASIO\u2019s questioning and detention warrants<\/a>, preventative detention orders<\/a> and powers to strip the citizenship<\/a> of returned foreign fighters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It should aim instead to be a world leader in developing innovative, community-based approaches to CVE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\"The\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Keiran Hardy This article was first published on Countering violent extremism (CVE) programs are recognised globally as a critical part of successful counter-terrorism strategies. In addition to anti-terrorism laws and surveillance powers, governments need CVE programs to address the underlying causes of terrorism. Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism strategy remains focused on prosecuting individuals for offences like being a member ofContinue reading “How the Australian government is failing on countering violent extremism”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":228,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,2],"tags":[18,6,56],"class_list":["post-1362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-countering-violent-extremism","category-spotlights","tag-counterterrorism","tag-cve","tag-extremism"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Keiran Hardy","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paNLK1-lY","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":113,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/06\/14\/crime-prevention-and-countering-violent-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":0},"title":"Crime prevention and countering violent extremism","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy This brief is based on the following paper: Hardy, K. (2020). A crime prevention framework for CVE. Terrorism and Political Violence, https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/09546553.2020.1727450 What problem does your research address? Programs for countering violent extremism (CVE) have become a core component of national counter-terrorism strategies, but there is a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "briefs"","block_context":{"text":"briefs","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/briefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1627,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/09\/02\/episode-2-how-do-we-reduce-the-risk-of-terrorism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":1},"title":"A Matter of Crime, Episode 2: How do we reduce the risk of terrorism?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"It's one of society's great conundrums, how best to counter violent extremism, that has become a part of modern life. In this episode, we speak to one of Australia's leading researchers into how to best reduce the risk of terrorism, Griffith University Criminology Institute Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr Keiran Hardy.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "countering violent extremism"","block_context":{"text":"countering violent extremism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/countering-violent-extremism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2243,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2020\/02\/11\/when-does-someone-radicalise-and-deradicalise\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":2},"title":"When does someone radicalise and deradicalise?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"February 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy Researchers in terrorism studies frequently ask questions about radicalisation - what is it, how does it happen, who is most susceptible, and how it can be reversed. Generally speaking, radicalisation is a process in which an individual internalises an extremist ideology and moves towards violent action. Beyond\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "countering violent extremism"","block_context":{"text":"countering violent extremism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/countering-violent-extremism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/brain.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2572,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2021\/10\/12\/before-9-11-australia-had-no-counter-terrorism-laws-now-we-have-92-but-are-we-safer\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":3},"title":"Before 9\/11, Australia had no counter-terrorism laws, now we have 92 \u2014 but are we safer?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"By Rebecca Ananian-Welsh* and Keiran Hardy This article first appeared on Australia is a long way from New York and Washington DC, but the September 11 terror attacks had a profound impact on our country. In Afghanistan and Iraq, we became embroiled in decades-long insurgencies. At home, the attacks had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "counterterrorism"","block_context":{"text":"counterterrorism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/counterterrorism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2998,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2022\/12\/12\/does-australia-need-new-laws-to-combat-right-wing-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":4},"title":"Does Australia need new laws to combat right-wing extremism?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy This article was first published on At the\u00a0National Press Club\u00a0this week, Home Affairs Minister Clare O\u2019Neil flagged that Labor would propose\u00a0changes to Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism laws. She cited an increase in diverse threats beyond religious fundamentalism, a trend towards lone-actor, low-sophistication attacks, and more\u00a0younger people being radicalised. Specifically,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "radicalisation"","block_context":{"text":"radicalisation","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/radicalisation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2481,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2020\/10\/20\/assaults-on-public-officers-a-review-of-research-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":1362,"position":5},"title":"Assaults on Public Officers: A Review of Research Evidence","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"By Christine Bond, Louise Porter, Margo van Felius and Tiahna Mulholland* This report, commissioned by the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council, presents an overview of the literature that addresses two topics. Topic 1 analyses evidence around the causes, frequency and seriousness of assaults on public officers; and topic 2 examines evidence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "assault"","block_context":{"text":"assault","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/assault\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/10\/Screen-Shot-2020-10-20-at-10.34.34-am.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/10\/Screen-Shot-2020-10-20-at-10.34.34-am.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/10\/Screen-Shot-2020-10-20-at-10.34.34-am.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/10\/Screen-Shot-2020-10-20-at-10.34.34-am.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/228"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}