{"id":1916,"date":"2019-09-05T09:34:44","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T23:34:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/?p=1916"},"modified":"2019-11-11T12:33:03","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T02:33:03","slug":"exploring-the-relationship-between-social-identity-perceptions-of-threat-and-support-for-punitive-counter-terrorism-policies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/09\/05\/exploring-the-relationship-between-social-identity-perceptions-of-threat-and-support-for-punitive-counter-terrorism-policies\/","title":{"rendered":"Social identity, threat perceptions, and support for counter-terrorism policies"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Harley Williamson<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This brief is based on the following paper: Williamson, H. (2019). Pride and prejudice: Exploring how identity processes shape public attitudes towards Australian counter-terrorism measures<\/a>. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology<\/em>, pp. 1-20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What problem does your research address? <\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This research sought to answer the following question: To what extent do perceptions of threat and identity processes shape support for punitive counter-terrorism policies? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is this significant?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Counter-terrorism laws have become increasingly punitive. They afford authorities exclusive and expanded powers, and they restrict civil liberties (Piazza, 2015). Yet they continue to attract public support. This study examined how support for counter-terrorism laws is fostered. In traditional crime control research, findings consistently show a relationship between perceived threat from racial or ethnic minority groups and beliefs that they engage in crime at a higher rate than other population groups. Such attitudes result in public support for punitive crime control measures that are deemed to control individuals seen as an out-group and therefore as a \u201cthreat\u201d (Unnever & Cullen, 2010). Similar connections can be made between terrorism and Muslims. Underlying this relationship are social identity processes that may explain how some people can support harsh crime control policies that disproportionately impact other groups. It is possible that perceiving Muslims as a threat may help explain how punitive counter-terrorism measures garner support (Doosje, Zimmermann, K\u00fcpper, Zick, & Meertens, 2009). This study examined this hypothesis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

How did you conduct your research?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

We conducted a quantitative survey using the Facebook social media platform to recruit participants living in Australia. Researchers are increasingly turning to platforms that enable the collection of online convenience samples to conduct research (Pickett, Nix, & Roche, 2018). Facebook is thus becoming a well-known outlet for conducting research (Samuels & Zucco, 2013). It enables the net to be cast wider to attract participants interested in a study to complete the survey. Upon completion of the data collection and data cleaning, the final sample included 1,199 participants across all Australian states and territories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which social identity processes and perceptions of threat predicted support for counter-terrorism policies. Socio-demographic characteristics were also controlled for in the analyses. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are your major findings?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Findings of this study suggest that perceptions of threat matter most for explaining attitudes supportive of punitive counter-terrorism measures. Participants who perceived Muslims to be more threatening were more likely to support counter-terrorism laws that have the capacity to erode civil liberties and restrict human rights. Results of this study also show that those with a strong nationalistic identity as an Australian were more supportive of punitive counter-terrorism measures. We also tested the combined effect of identity processes and perceptions of threat, finding that support for counter-terrorism measures was strongest among participants who identified most strongly with their national Australian identity and <\/em>perceived Muslims as threatening. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does your research mean for policy\nand practice?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This study has three key implications: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. The public approval of counter-terrorism measures that afford authorities exclusive powers to restrict freedoms points to the potential for the dismissal of fundamental civil liberties, democratic processes and human rights. This possibility is potentially problematic in Australia where no formal Bill of Rights exists (Lynch, McGarrity, & Williams, 2015). As punitive attitudes can shape policy decisions, it is important to strike a balance between preserving national security interests and enacting proportionate legal responses. <\/strong><\/li>
  2. The influence of perceptions of threat towards Muslims reflects the continued presence of social exclusion (Chiricos, Welch, & Gertz, 2004). This is ironic given a primary component of Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism response is to enhance inclusion. In addition, Muslims are often the target of counter-terrorism measures, which can exacerbate divisive attitudes. Therefore, it is important to ensure community strategies can effectively unite diverse communities and <\/em>shape public attitudes towards counter-terrorism responses<\/strong>.<\/li>
  3. If negative attitudes towards Muslims continue to spread and be tolerated, laws that are deemed to control those seen as a threat will continue to be used. It is therefore important to denounce public support for policies that are driven by intolerance towards minority groups (Unnever & Cullen, 2010). Equipping communities with the tools necessary to reduce intergroup biases will assist in changing potentially harmful attitudes towards minority groups. <\/strong><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    References <\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    Chiricos, T.,\nWelch, K., & Gertz, M. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for\npunitive measures. Criminology, 42<\/em>(2),\n358\u2013390.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Doosje, B., Zimmermann, A., K\u00fcpper, B., Zick, A., & Meertens, R. (2009).\nTerrorist threat and perceived Islamic support for terrorist attacks as\npredictors of personal and institutional outgroup discrimination and support\nfor anti-immigration policies \u2013 Evidence from 9 European countries. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale,\n22<\/em>(3), 203\u2013233.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Lynch, A.,\nMcGarrity, N., & Williams, G. (2015). Inside\nAustralia\u2019s anti-terrorism laws and trials. <\/em>Sydney, Australia: NewSouth\nPublishing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Piazza, J. A.\n(2015). Terrorist suspect religious identity and public support for harsh\ninterrogation and detention practices. Political\nPsychology, 36<\/em>(6), 667\u2013690.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Pickett, J. T., Nix, J., &\nRoche, S. P. (2018). Testing a social schematic model of police procedural\njustice. Social Psychology Quarterly<\/em>, 81<\/em>(2), 97-125.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Samuels, D. J.\n& Zucco, C. (2013). Using Facebook as a subject recruitment tool for\nsurvey-experimental research, SSRN Paper.\n<\/em>DOI: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.2101458<\/a>.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Unnever, J. D.,\n& Cullen, F. T. (2010a). Racialrethnic intolerance and support for capital\npunishment: A cross-national comparison. Criminology,\n48<\/em>(3), 831\u2013864.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    By Harley Williamson This brief is based on the following paper: Williamson, H. (2019). Pride and prejudice: Exploring how identity processes shape public attitudes towards Australian counter-terrorism measures. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, pp. 1-20. What problem does your research address? This research sought to answer the following question: To what extent doContinue reading “Social identity, threat perceptions, and support for counter-terrorism policies”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":1921,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,41],"tags":[18,67,70],"class_list":["post-1916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-briefs","category-counterterrorism","tag-counterterrorism","tag-social-identity","tag-terrorism"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Keiran Hardy","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/shutterstock_263090648.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paNLK1-uU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1627,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/09\/02\/episode-2-how-do-we-reduce-the-risk-of-terrorism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":0},"title":"A Matter of Crime, Episode 2: How do we reduce the risk of terrorism?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"It's one of society's great conundrums, how best to counter violent extremism, that has become a part of modern life. In this episode, we speak to one of Australia's leading researchers into how to best reduce the risk of terrorism, Griffith University Criminology Institute Postdoctoral Research Fellow Dr Keiran Hardy.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "countering violent extremism"","block_context":{"text":"countering violent extremism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/countering-violent-extremism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/Group2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2572,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2021\/10\/12\/before-9-11-australia-had-no-counter-terrorism-laws-now-we-have-92-but-are-we-safer\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":1},"title":"Before 9\/11, Australia had no counter-terrorism laws, now we have 92 \u2014 but are we safer?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"By Rebecca Ananian-Welsh* and Keiran Hardy This article first appeared on Australia is a long way from New York and Washington DC, but the September 11 terror attacks had a profound impact on our country. In Afghanistan and Iraq, we became embroiled in decades-long insurgencies. At home, the attacks had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "counterterrorism"","block_context":{"text":"counterterrorism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/counterterrorism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":113,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/06\/14\/crime-prevention-and-countering-violent-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":2},"title":"Crime prevention and countering violent extremism","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy This brief is based on the following paper: Hardy, K. (2020). A crime prevention framework for CVE. Terrorism and Political Violence, https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/09546553.2020.1727450 What problem does your research address? Programs for countering violent extremism (CVE) have become a core component of national counter-terrorism strategies, but there is a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "briefs"","block_context":{"text":"briefs","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/briefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1362,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2018\/10\/16\/how-the-australian-government-is-failing-on-countering-violent-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":3},"title":"How the Australian government is failing on countering violent extremism","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"October 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"By\u00a0Keiran Hardy This article was first published on Countering violent extremism (CVE) programs are\u00a0recognised globally\u00a0as a critical part of successful counter-terrorism strategies. In addition to anti-terrorism laws and surveillance powers, governments need CVE programs to address the underlying causes of terrorism. Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism strategy remains focused on prosecuting individuals for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "countering violent extremism"","block_context":{"text":"countering violent extremism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/countering-violent-extremism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/06\/stock3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2189,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2020\/01\/20\/media-reports-of-terrorism-can-create-public-fear\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":4},"title":"Media reports of terrorism can create public fear","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"January 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"By Harley Williamson, Suzanna Fay* and Toby Miles-Johnson** This article was first published on theglobalcoalition.org Accurate and responsible news coverage of terrorist attacks is critical because media consumption relates to a heightened fear of terrorism. Media reports inform the wider public about terrorism, but they often emphasise a picture of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "spotlights"","block_context":{"text":"spotlights","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/spotlights\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_654117235.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_654117235.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_654117235.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_654117235.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2998,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2022\/12\/12\/does-australia-need-new-laws-to-combat-right-wing-extremism\/","url_meta":{"origin":1916,"position":5},"title":"Does Australia need new laws to combat right-wing extremism?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy This article was first published on At the\u00a0National Press Club\u00a0this week, Home Affairs Minister Clare O\u2019Neil flagged that Labor would propose\u00a0changes to Australia\u2019s counter-terrorism laws. She cited an increase in diverse threats beyond religious fundamentalism, a trend towards lone-actor, low-sophistication attacks, and more\u00a0younger people being radicalised. Specifically,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "radicalisation"","block_context":{"text":"radicalisation","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/radicalisation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/12\/shutterstock_1275514903.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/09\/shutterstock_263090648.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1916\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}