{"id":2245,"date":"2020-02-11T11:51:48","date_gmt":"2020-02-11T01:51:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/?p=2245"},"modified":"2020-02-11T11:55:07","modified_gmt":"2020-02-11T01:55:07","slug":"family-law-court-orders-for-supervised-contact-in-custodial-disputes-unanswered-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2020\/02\/11\/family-law-court-orders-for-supervised-contact-in-custodial-disputes-unanswered-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Family Law Court orders for supervised contact in custodial disputes \u2013 unanswered questions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Emily Schindeler<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This brief is based on the following paper: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schindeler E<\/strong>\u00a0(2019). Family Law Court orders for supervised contact in custodial disputes \u2013 unanswered questions<\/a>. Children Australia 44: 194\u2013201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cha.2019.42<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\nproblem is your research designed to address? Why is this significant?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A key aim of the Family Court of Australia in the case of custodial disputes between separated parents is ensuring the best interests of the child. This means protection of children from the risk of psychological or physical abuse, neglect, and violence while providing for the opportunity for a meaningful relationship with both parents. However, the Family Court operates in a highly contentious political, legal and human environment. Determining the nature or extent of any risk in the context of competing claims in custodial disputes is often fraught with a lack of factual evidence and conflicting assessments by expert witnesses (Schindeler, 2019). It is relatively common in such cases for the Court to issue orders requiring access by a non-custodial parent to the child to be subject to supervision (generally by a funded supervision centre) on an interim, transitional or permanent basis. The extent to which such orders are employed, under what circumstances and the potential implications for the best interest of children was the concern for this study.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

How\ndid you conduct your research?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Using the\nAustLII database, all cases involving custodial disputes between separated\nparents heard by the Family Court, including appeals considered by the Full\nCourt, between January 2016 and April 2019 were reviewed to identify those in which\nsupervised contact formed part of interim or final orders by the Court. This\nprocess identified 103 cases in which supervised visitation and changeovers\nwere included in orders. This involved 172 children from as young as 2 to as\nold as 17 years of age. A thematic analysis was undertaken to identify emerging\nthemes with respect to the conditions, reasoning and application of such\norders. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\nwere your major findings?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Three\nthemes emerged associated with the duration of orders, the reasons for orders,\nand the critical implications for children and supervised access centre\nproviders. The provision of supervised access orders on a permanent or\nindeterminant period emerges as an issue. Of all parents subject to supervision\norders, 63% of mothers and 52% of fathers were subject to long term supervised access.\nThis differed considerably from that of a decade earlier when supervised\ncontact formed part of interim orders at the twice the rate of final orders (Commerford\n& Hunter, 2015; Bala, N., Saini, M., & Spitz, S. (2016). This then has\nmajor implications for the capacity of supervision providers to meet ongoing\ndemand and for non-custodial parents to access and afford ongoing contact\ncosts. Long delays in accessing a service as a consequence of the level of\ndemand was noted by the Court and the concern for the implications for\nmaintaining any relationship between the child and parent (Saini, M, Newman,\nJ., & Christensen, M. (2017). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mental\nhealth and substance use are main reasons for making orders for supervision for\nboth fathers and mothers. However psychological abuse was more often cited in\ncases involving mothers while violence toward the other parent (not the child) was\nmore often cited in cases involving fathers. This can present significant\nchallenges for supervisory centre staff who are not trained medical, mental\nhealth or therapeutic practitioners. Because the cases heard by the Court\nrarely heard the voice of the child (despite the presence of an Independent\nChildren\u2019s Lawyer), particularly in appeals seeking changes to supervision orders,\nit was not possible to determine whether such controlled access was beneficial\nfrom the child\u2019s experiential perspective. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\ndoes your research mean for policy and practice?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Given the\ncritical role that supervised visitation and the role of child contact centres\nhave as key tools of the Court, it is timely to focus on the nature of the\nunanswered questions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In moving forward, additional attention is needed not only to the resourcing of supervision services to be better able to respond to demand, but equally to consider the viability and effectiveness of service models which are not centre based when long term or indeterminant supervision orders are made. This means there is a priority need to understand the extent to which children subject to such contact restrictions enjoy the benefit of parental relationship and the extent to which parents are able to successfully transition to unsupervised access, whether provided for within orders or as a consequence of rehearing by the Court.\u00a0While the Court is transparent as to the reasons for making such orders, the Court also needs greater access to evidence as to the outcomes for parents and children given the current trend toward the reliance on supervision in resolving custodial disputes.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

References:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Bala, N., Saini, M., & Spitz, S. (2016). Supervised access as a stepping stone rather than a destination: A qualitative review of Ontario services & policies<\/em> for assisting families transitioning from supervised access. Queen’s Law Research Paper Series 2016-085<\/em>. Canada: Queen’s University Faculty of Law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Commerford, J., & Hunter, C. (2015). Children\u2019s Contact Services Key Issues, CFCA Paper No 25 <\/em>2015. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Services. Retrieved from https:\/\/aifs.gov.au\/cfca\/publications\/childrens-contactservices<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saini, M, Newman, J., & Christensen, M. (2017). When supervision becomes the only plan: An analysis of long\u2010term use of supervised access and exchange services after separation. Family Court Review<\/em>, 55(4), 604\u2013616. doi:10.1111\/fcre.12307<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schindeler, E. (2019). Assessing allegations of child sex abuse in custody disputes. Children Australia<\/em>, 44(1), 5\u201312<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Emily Schindeler This brief is based on the following paper: Schindeler E\u00a0(2019). Family Law Court orders for supervised contact in custodial disputes \u2013 unanswered questions. Children Australia 44: 194\u2013201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cha.2019.42 What problem is your research designed to address? Why is this significant? A key aim of the Family Court of Australia in the caseContinue reading “Family Law Court orders for supervised contact in custodial disputes \u2013 unanswered questions”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":2246,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,91,92,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-briefs","category-courts","category-family-law","category-posts"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Keiran Hardy","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/Harry_Gibbs_Commonwealth_Law_Courts_Building_Brisbane_01.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paNLK1-Ad","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2259,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2020\/02\/19\/federal-court-decision-confirms-need-for-urgent-law-reform-to-protect-journalists\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":0},"title":"Federal court decision confirms need for urgent law reform to protect journalists","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"February 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy On Monday, the Federal Court of Australia upheld as valid the search warrant which allowed the AFP to raid the ABC\u2019s Sydney offices last year. Those raids followed the publication of stories about \u2018The Afghan Files\u2019, a collection of leaked defence force documents which suggested that Australian\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "press freedom"","block_context":{"text":"press freedom","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/press-freedom\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/shutterstock_720683701-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/shutterstock_720683701-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/shutterstock_720683701-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/shutterstock_720683701-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2572,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2021\/10\/12\/before-9-11-australia-had-no-counter-terrorism-laws-now-we-have-92-but-are-we-safer\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":1},"title":"Before 9\/11, Australia had no counter-terrorism laws, now we have 92 \u2014 but are we safer?","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"By Rebecca Ananian-Welsh* and Keiran Hardy This article first appeared on Australia is a long way from New York and Washington DC, but the September 11 terror attacks had a profound impact on our country. In Afghanistan and Iraq, we became embroiled in decades-long insurgencies. At home, the attacks had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "counterterrorism"","block_context":{"text":"counterterrorism","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/counterterrorism\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2021\/10\/Screen-Shot-2021-10-12-at-1.06.43-pm.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2629,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2022\/04\/05\/evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-dangerous-sex-offender-legislation\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":2},"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Dangerous Sex Offender Legislation","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Danielle Harris and The Hon Justice Peter Applegarth AM* How effective is the system of preventative detention for sex offenders that has operated in Australia for nearly 20 years?\u00a0How do we define and measure effectiveness?Might evidence-based research propose more effective ways to devote the resources that the system currently\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "desistance"","block_context":{"text":"desistance","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/desistance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/04\/Queensland_Parliament_House.jpeg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1942,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2019\/08\/16\/press-freedom-in-australia-needs-much-more-than-piecemeal-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":3},"title":"Press freedom in Australia needs much more than piecemeal protection","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"By Keiran Hardy This article first appeared on The Interpreter, published by the Lowy Institute. This week in the Australian parliament, the Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security held the first public hearing for its\u00a0inquiry into press freedom. The inquiry follows raids in June by the Australian Federal Police on\u00a0the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "press freedom"","block_context":{"text":"press freedom","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/press-freedom\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/hongkong-3623060_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/hongkong-3623060_1280.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/hongkong-3623060_1280.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/hongkong-3623060_1280.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/hongkong-3623060_1280.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":3154,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2024\/08\/01\/redress-and-civil-litigation-myths-and-realities\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":4},"title":"Redress and civil litigation: myths and realities","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"August 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"By Juliet Davis There is a myth that civil litigation is superior to redress schemes for institutional wrongs such as sexual and physical abuse. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 This myth is supported by three claims: 1. \u2018Civil litigation establishes legal liability and redress schemes do not.\u2019 2. 'Civil litigation can address all relevant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "abuse"","block_context":{"text":"abuse","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/abuse\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/shutterstock_1113847118-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/shutterstock_1113847118-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/shutterstock_1113847118-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2019\/08\/shutterstock_1113847118-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2610,"url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/2022\/03\/29\/police-killings-in-australia\/","url_meta":{"origin":2245,"position":5},"title":"Police killings in Australia","author":"Keiran Hardy","date":"March 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Professor Mark Finnane _______________________ More than 50 years ago a young legal academic from the University of Western Australia, Richard Harding, published his study of Police Killings in Australia. Issued as a Penguin Special, the book remains unique, a forensic legal study of numerous killings of citizens by police\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "courts"","block_context":{"text":"courts","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/category\/posts\/courts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/03\/Rolfe.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/03\/Rolfe.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/03\/Rolfe.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2022\/03\/Rolfe.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"featured_image_thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2020\/02\/Harry_Gibbs_Commonwealth_Law_Courts_Building_Brisbane_01.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2245"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2245\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}