![\"\"](\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2025\/12\/Daly-1-1024x768.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nThe Edwin H. Sutherland Award, given by the American Society of Criminology (ASC), recognises outstanding contributions to criminology theory or research, honouring influential scholars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Since its creation in 1960, the award has been given to only 63 scholars and to just seven women – placing Daly in a very small circle of criminologists whose work is considered foundational to the discipline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The award honours not only her body of work, but a career spent reshaping how the world understands justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Key insights from Justice: word, idea, practice<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n At the centre of this recognition is Daly\u2019s new article, \u2018Justice: word, idea, practice\u2019<\/em>, a sweeping re-examination of one of the most invoked concepts in public life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIf there\u2019s one thing I try to do in my writing, it is to clarify the clutter of confusion, of words that don\u2019t make sense but are ideologically convenient,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhat I would like people to think about is this: the next time they use the word justice or injustice or social justice – what are they saying, what are they talking about exactly?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n A key contribution of Daly\u2019s article is drawing a distinction between macrolevel understandings of justice (distributive justice) in political philosophy and mesolevel understandings of justice as rectification (criminal and civil justice) in penal philosophy, law, and social science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIf you look at papers published in the journal Criminology<\/em> in the last five years, this one is unusual. It\u2019s entirely theoretical and philosophical, and I decided to undertake it to work out a problem I\u2019ve had for years: relating societal-level inequalities to criminal justice practices,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In her paper, she calls attention to \u201cunresolved disconnects\u201d in macrolevel and mesolevel \u201cunderstandings of justice and \u2026 proposes the abandonment of ideal theories and construct of distribution of benefits and burdens in philosophy in favour of nonideal theories and societal inequalities or injustices.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The \u201creview of criminal, civil, and restorative justice identifies limits on what each can achieve and discusses the compromised character of criminal justice in unjust societies.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n When comparing the fields of institutional, historical, and transitional justice, [she identifies] “distinctive questions for justice and obstacles for victims and society.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI see justice as having two major registers of societal relations \u2013 macro and meso,\u201d Professor Daly reiterates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe macrolevel is inequalities and how people talk about that in terms of what is right and just at a societal level \u2013 what is a just society. But most day-to-day understanding of justice are mesolevel practices \u2013 what happens in criminal justice, civil justice, and rectification more generally.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n From Yale to Alice Springs \u2013 decades of justice exploration<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n This expansive view of justice did not emerge overnight. Daly\u2019s intellectual journey has spanned continents, beginning in the United States at SUNY-Albany, Yale, and the University of Michigan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Her path shifted profoundly in 1995, when she travelled to Australia as a Senior Fulbright Scholar to study restorative justice with John Braithwaite. What began as a short research stay became a permanent relocation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since joining Griffith University, Daly has become one of the most influential criminologists of her generation. She has written foundational work on gender, race, crime, and criminal justice; restorative justice; and conventional and innovative justice responses to sexual violence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Her books, Gender, Crime, and Punishment<\/em> and Redressing Institutional Abuse of Children<\/em>, have influenced scholars, policymakers, and practitioners around the world; and 25 of her publications have been reprinted and eight have been translated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Daly is leading a monumental project examining how 22 countries and self-governing territories respond to institutional abuse of children and associated historical\/policy wrongs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n New paper is a must-read<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n From teaching at Yale to visiting jails in Alice Springs, GCI\u2019s Kathleen Daly has spent a career examining justice from different angles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Her new paper is a culmination of a lifetime of research and must-read for all criminologists, especially those entering the field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe award gave me permission to write this article which I wouldn\u2019t have had otherwise,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cYou want to be able to say something meaningful, and I\u2019m looking forward to learning what people make of it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Ultimately, Daly finds, no one justice field of knowledge can accommodate all large-scale wrongs in diverse sociopolitical contexts, and she puts forward her idea of justice, which is keyed to research on victim\u2013survivors\u2019 claims for institutional justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Daly writes, justice may be an \u201cunachievable ideal\u201d, but it remains a guiding horizon and a concept we should all think more deeply about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For more, read \u2018Justice: word, idea, practice\u2019 here: https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/1745-9125.70009?af=R<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/gci-insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/29\/2025\/12\/Daly-2-1024x768.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n