{"id":16662,"date":"2023-11-29T08:00:53","date_gmt":"2023-11-28T22:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/?p=16662"},"modified":"2024-05-31T15:32:13","modified_gmt":"2024-05-31T05:32:13","slug":"whats-the-future-of-academic-publishing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/2023\/11\/29\/whats-the-future-of-academic-publishing\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s the future of academic publishing?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">What is the future of academic publishing?\u00a0 In an environment of paywalls, predatory publishing and a publish or perish approach to funding, what are the pressures our researchers are facing?\u00a0 This month we take a look at a recent <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41562-023-01637-2\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Nature Article<\/span><\/a> <span data-contrast=\"auto\">which <\/span><span data-contrast=\"none\">unpacks the future of academic publishing according to scientists.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"none\">The challenges.<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Academic publishing is frequently criticised for being unequal, exclusionary, and opaque, with nearly 70% of scientific articles hidden behind paywalls. This is undoubtedly true in part, and this issue partnered with ongoing observations that the peer review system can be inefficient and biased does indicate something is broken in academic publishing.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Is the publishing model at fault?\u00a0<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Publishing has never been an altruistic model, and long delays in processing submitted articles can cause research dissemination to stall.\u00a0 This all seems insurmountable yet perhaps the greater problem is the current publishing model itself.\u00a0 The current prestige model means the ranking a journal enjoys can sometimes unjustly outweigh the intrinsic value of the research itself.\u00a0 In reality this means potentially highly significant research published in low-ranking journals will be ignored or overlooked.\u00a0 Similarly, research published in languages other than English often fail to reach the wider research community.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">A prime example exists in various countries across Latin America. In making the lion\u2019s share of their research publications open and free to encourage equity and collaboration for the advancement of human knowledge, this research is underrepresented in databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. In short, this makes potentially highly valuable research undiscoverable, to the detriment of the researcher, the community and scientific advancement.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Is Open research the answer?\u00a0<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Adding to rising concerns, the ongoing move by commercial publishers towards article processing charge models, a system which charges authors\/researchers substantial fees (that often are not covered by the host research institution) to publish their research. The effect of this?\u00a0 Researchers are greatly disadvantaged, especially if they are from emerging economies and developing nations or have little access to funding.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">In response, the call for <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.griffith.edu.au\/library\/research-publishing\/open-research\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Open research<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\"> grows as the best collaborative and social practice, as research institutions and governments continue to grapple with the tension between societal needs and major commercial influences. With this in play, publishers have responded with income driven <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/2022\/09\/02\/dont-fall-prey-to-predatory-and-junk-publishers\/\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">predatory journals<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\"> practices.\u00a0 This practice is fueled by the pressure researchers are placed under to publish their work in order to obtain research funding and advance their careers. Researchers are faced with a dire decision <\/span><span data-contrast=\"none\">\u2014<\/span><span data-contrast=\"none\"> if they don\u2019t publish, they perish.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/library.unimelb.edu.au\/open-scholarship\/preprints\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Preprints<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\"> (which are free and open) are proposed as a solution to many issues in academic publishing, offering a way to accelerate the dissemination of research, gain early feedback, and increase access. Preprints are seen as a means to reduce publication bias and create a more equitable and diverse research landscape.\u00a0 But does this go far enough to mitigate the issue in an ever-shifting space of practice, reputation and funding?<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Does technology hold the answer?<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Artificial intelligence (AI) remains a controversial solution but is it the panacea as pundits are proposing? AI might have an impact on traditional academic publishing with large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 being able to manage knowledge in different ways by examining the raw data and drawing its own conclusions without having to read any written articles to explain the research. The potential here is to address publishing issues by eliminating the published article all together. However, this idea is futuristic and unlikely to occur any time soon and without significant shifting in governmental and industrial thinking and business models. Perhaps more feasible is the idea that AI will be able to conduct peer review reports, producing quality assessments of research.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">The future of academic publishing is still unclear and at its very best we are entering the earliest stages of understanding the broader implications of slanted practice that focuses on commercial interests as opposed to societal benefit.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">Read a comprehensive article about the challenges of and possible solutions for academic publishing put forward by prominent scientists in the Nature article titled <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41562-023-01637-2\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">The future of academic publishing<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\">.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-15200\" src=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2021\/12\/The-Library-here-to-help-logo-_-Transparent-min-300x300.png\" alt=\"White words inside a red circle. The words read, \u2018The Library: here to help\u2019.\" width=\"129\" height=\"129\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-16222 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/06\/Collection-tagline-300x73.png\" alt=\"Griffith University logo. Text reads 'Discover the resources you need in the Library Collection'\" width=\"300\" height=\"73\" srcset=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/06\/Collection-tagline-300x73.png 300w, https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/06\/Collection-tagline-1024x250.png 1024w, https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/06\/Collection-tagline-768x187.png 768w, https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/06\/Collection-tagline.png 1271w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is the future of academic publishing?\u00a0 In an environment of paywalls, predatory publishing and a publish or perish approach to funding, what are the pressures our researchers are facing?\u00a0 This month we take a look at a recent Nature Article which unpacks the future of academic publishing according to scientists.\u00a0\u00a0 The challenges.\u00a0 Academic publishing<a href=\"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/2023\/11\/29\/whats-the-future-of-academic-publishing\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"sr-only\">&#8220;What\u2019s the future of academic publishing?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":152,"featured_media":17116,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,5,3],"tags":[193],"class_list":["post-16662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academics","category-researchers","category-students","tag-topic-of-the-month"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"Vanessa Gatt","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/36\/2023\/03\/Question.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/152"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16662\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17116"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testblogs.griffith.edu.au\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}